Statement-based vs Row-based Replication

4 stars based on 75 reviews

Replication as most people know it, has mostly been SQL statement propagation from master to slave. In this post I intend on highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of both the types of replication to help you choose the best one.

I also follow up with my own recommendation. With statement-based replication, every SQL statement that could modify data binlog_format statement vs row logged on the binlog_format statement vs row.

Then those SQL statements are replayed on the slaves against the same binlog_format statement vs row and in the same binlog_format statement vs row.

The statement-based replication corresponds to the statement-based binary logging format. But there are a few exceptions, when a new table is created, dropped, or altered, the actual SQL statement is recorded. Binlog_format statement vs row row-based replication corresponds to row-based binary logging format.

Following are some of the advantages of statement-based replication. All of these advantages come down from the fact that the SQL statements are logged:. Although both the types have advantages and binlog_format statement vs row, but for me the advantage that row-based replication offers in terms of data consistency between master and slave, far outweighs any of the disadvantages.

Though you might point out the fact that large updates produce large update logs in case of row-based replication, but those cases in real-world would be far and few and not very frequent. Also, stored routines and triggers are increasingly being used after their introduction in MySQL and row-based replication allows us to use them without thinking about them being unsafe for replication.

There are also other host of optimizations that are possible due to the way how this kind of replication works, which I will be discussing in a future post. He currently works at Uber on ensuring storage reliability and scalability. Previously, he helped different web properties scale their MySQL infrastructure. There is always less data that is to be transferred between the master and the slave. Binlog_format statement vs row is less space taken up in the update logs.

Tweets that mention Statement-based vs Row-based Replication ovais. I dun think that these statements are wrong. If you consider the fact that in case of statement-based log only SQL statements are logged, then Ofcourse the size of SQL is always going to be less then the binary data that is logged for every row in the case of row-based log.

Then it still gets binlogged with statement-based replication. Therefore, it takes up more space. Theoretically speaking, yes it could give the best of both the worlds. Menu - -. Statement-based vs Row-based Replication. In MySQLReplication Tags binary logsbinlogsconcurrencydata auditingdata consistencydata integritydata saftetymastermysql resourcesoptimizationperformancereplicationrow-basedslavestatement-basedstored routinestriggers January 27, ovais. Understanding InnoDB clustered indexes.

Tuning important Apache parameters. I agree with you. Dear RBL Lover, try to rebuild your index on production.

Best commodity broker in coimbatore

  • Binary options cloner review tutor in austrian

    Investment option with highest rate of return

  • Mangareva binary trading trade options in macedonia

    Binare optionen immer gewinnen

Optiontrade pips binary

  • Introduction to binary options robots free download

    Binare branding-optionen mirror

  • Mempodroid binary options option trading in guinea

    How to trade options in singapore dubai

  • Mayfair options demo account

    Bitcoin traders ltd

60 second binary option strategi

10 comments Binary options trading 50 deposit top 10

Cara memahami pasar forex

By default, MySQL binary logging and replication is statement-based: MySQL also supports row-based replication: Row-based replication was introduced to provide perfect replication of data that is non-deterministic: It can also have a performance impact. Short SQL queries that affect a lot of rows would require more bandwidth to transmit as row-based replication. For example, if replicated by row, this statement would have to uniquely identify 10, rows; it would be much more efficiently transmitted as statement-based: But difficult to evaluate queries that change relatively little data would be much faster to apply to slaves if the master told them what to change instead of forcing them to repeat the work.

For example, this statement requires a table scan and a hash calculation on every row; slaves could save considerable processor time if the master just told them the outcome of all those calculations using row-based replication: In Mixed Mode replication, most queries are replicated by statement.

But transactions MySQL knows are non-deterministic are replicated by row. To test, SSH to master. We're going to look at the format of a statement-based binary log. Tell master to end the current log file and start a new one. Exit MySQL and take a look at this statement in the binary log, using the log file you learned from show master status. You can see in this statement-based binary log file that replication carries a lot metadata to make sure that the statement works the same on the slave:.

Now SSH to slave. Now we're going to intentionally use a function that is not compatible with statement-based replication. The UUID function creates a universally unique identifier. By definition, the output of the UUID function should be different every time it is run. Note, RAND doesn't have this problem; MySQL logs the random number generator seed to the binary log; using the same seed, the slave generates the same pseudorandom number.

You can see that the details column for the newest row is different between the two servers. They're similar because UUID is built from timestamp and network address, and the statement replicated quickly between servers with similar network characteristics. The master will have started a new binary log file during the service restart, so let's run two interesting transactions.

First, insert another row on the master containing a UUID, to show that row-based replication solves that problem:. The master will have started a new binary log file during the service restart, these two transactions are the only content in the latest log file. Near the top of the file, you'll see the transaction where you inserted the working row with a UUID. You'll also notice that there's no obvious way to figure out what is going on reading the log file, even with the help of mysqlbinlog.

The huge binlog data block which we've reproduced barely a fraction of here contains the information the slave will need to uniquely identify each of the affected rows. In Mixed Mode, MySQL uses statement-based replication for most queries, switching to row-based replication only when statement-based replication would cause an inconsistency or corruption.

It is a compromise between the two replication types we've already explored. Now verify that the new row, as replicated to the slave , has a details column that matches the master:. Meanwhile, the DELETE used the more efficient statement-based replication because it did not contain any non-deterministic warning signs. Mixed Mode uses row-based replication for any transaction that: Review a Statement-Based Binary Log.

Review a Row-Based Binary Log. Configure Mixed Mode Replication. Review a Mixed Mode Binary Log.